Mitsubishi Colt 2008 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.5 (petrol) | 1.1 - 1.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 109 HP | 68 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 100 - 145 NM | 100 - 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 - 12.8 seconds | 8 - 14.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 6.1 | 4.8 - 6.8 | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt 2008 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Colt 2005. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.52 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Colt 2008 is 7 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt 2005, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 760 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`439 | ~ 1`482 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |