Mitsubishi Colt 2008 vs Mazda 2 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.5 (petrol) | 1.3 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 109 HP | 68 - 103 HP | |
| Torque: | 100 - 145 NM | 121 - 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 - 12.8 seconds | 10.4 - 15.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 6.1 | 4.2 - 6.8 | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 2. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is smaller, but higher. Mitsubishi Colt is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda 2, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 250 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 787 litres | |
|
Mazda 2 has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Colt has 30 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 1 metres more than that of the Mazda 2, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`439 | ~ 1`496 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |