Mitsubishi Colt 2008 vs Hyundai i20 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.5 (petrol) | 1.2 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 109 HP | 75 - 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 100 - 145 NM | 119 - 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 - 12.8 seconds | 9.5 - 16.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 6.1 | 4.4 - 6.5 | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Hyundai i20. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Colt is 6 cm shorter than the Hyundai i20, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 295 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1060 litres | |
|
Hyundai i20 has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Colt has 75 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai i20. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.4 metres more than that of the Hyundai i20, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`439 | ~ 1`588 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Hyundai i20 has
| |