Mitsubishi Colt 2008 vs Hyundai Getz 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.5 (petrol) | 1.1 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Hyundai Getz is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 109 HP | 66 - 106 HP | |
| Torque: | 100 - 145 NM | 99 - 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 - 12.8 seconds | 9.6 - 15.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 6.1 | 4.5 - 7.0 | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Hyundai Getz. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Colt is 6 cm longer than the Hyundai Getz, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 254 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 977 litres | |
|
Hyundai Getz has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mitsubishi Colt uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.8 metres more than that of the Hyundai Getz, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`439 kg | ~ 1`494 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 968 kg | ~ 1`038 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 471 kg | ~ 456 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Hyundai Getz has
| |