Mitsubishi Colt 2008 vs Hyundai Getz 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.5 (petrol) | 1.1 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 109 HP | 66 - 106 HP | |
| Torque: | 100 - 145 NM | 99 - 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 - 12.8 seconds | 9.6 - 15.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 6.1 | 4.5 - 7.0 | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Hyundai Getz. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Colt is 6 cm longer than the Hyundai Getz, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 254 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 977 litres | |
|
Hyundai Getz has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Colt has 34 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Getz. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Colt uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.8 metres more than that of the Hyundai Getz, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`439 | ~ 1`494 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Hyundai Getz has
| |