Mitsubishi Colt 2008 vs Hyundai Getz 2005

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

Mitsubishi Colt
2008 - 2012
Hyundai Getz
2005 - 2009
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.1 - 1.5 (petrol)1.1 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel)


Power: 75 - 109 HP66 - 106 HP
Torque: 100 - 145 NM99 - 215 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.8 - 12.8 seconds9.6 - 15.6 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.5 - 6.14.5 - 7.0
Mitsubishi Colt petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Hyundai Getz.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!


Length: 3.88 m3.82 m
Width: 1.70 m1.66 m
Height: 1.52 m1.49 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Colt is 6 cm longer than the Hyundai Getz, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 220 litres254 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data977 litres
Hyundai Getz has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Colt has 34 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Getz. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Colt uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.8 metres more than that of the Hyundai Getz, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`439~ 1`494
Safety: no datano data
above average

Average price (€): 32001200
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Colt has
  • only petrol engines available
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Hyundai Getz has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: