Mitsubishi Colt 2008 vs Honda Jazz 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.5 | 1.2 - 1.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 109 HP | 90 - 99 HP | |
| Torque: | 100 - 145 NM | 114 - 127 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 - 12.8 seconds | 11 - 14 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 6.1 | 5.3 | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Jazz. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.53 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Colt is 2 cm shorter than the Honda Jazz, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 428 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1396 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Colt has 208 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.7 metres more than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`439 | ~ 1`510 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |