Mitsubishi Colt 2004 vs Hyundai Getz 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.5 | 1.1 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 150 HP | 66 - 106 HP | |
| Torque: | 100 - 210 NM | 99 - 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 - 14.5 seconds | 9.6 - 15.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 6.8 | 4.5 - 7.0 | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Hyundai Getz. On average, Mitsubishi Colt equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Getz. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.86 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is larger. Mitsubishi Colt is 4 cm longer than the Hyundai Getz, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 254 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
760 litres | 977 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has 246 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Getz. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Getz (by 217 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.8 metres more than that of the Hyundai Getz, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`497 | ~ 1`494 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 7.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Hyundai Getz has
| |