Mitsubishi Colt 2007 vs Nissan Note 2005

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

Mitsubishi Colt
2007 - 2008
Nissan Note
2005 - 2009
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.1 - 1.51.4 - 1.6


Power: 75 - 109 HP68 - 110 HP
Torque: 100 - 210 NM128 - 200 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.9 - 13.4 seconds10.7 - 16.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.6 - 6.25.1 - 7.0
Mitsubishi Colt petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan Note. On average, Mitsubishi Colt equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Note.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!


Length: 3.87 m4.08 m
Width: 1.70 m1.69 m
Height: 1.55 m1.55 m
Mitsubishi Colt is 21 cm shorter than the Nissan Note, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 220 litres280 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
854 litres1332 litres
Nissan Note has more luggage space.
Mitsubishi Colt has 60 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Note. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Note (by 478 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.2 metres less than that of the Nissan Note.
Gross weight (kg): no data~ 1`576
Safety: no data
above average

Average price (€): no data2200
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Colt has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Nissan Note has
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: