Mitsubishi Colt 2007 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.5 (petrol, diesel) | 1.0 - 1.2 (petrol) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mitsubishi Colt is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 109 HP | 71 - 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 100 - 210 NM | 88 - 106 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 13.4 seconds | 11.7 - 13.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 - 6.2 | 4.1 - 4.2 | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Space Star. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.87 m | 3.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is larger. Mitsubishi Colt is 8 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Star, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 235 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
854 litres | 912 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Colt has 15 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Star. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Colt uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Star (by 58 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 1.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`333 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has
| |