Mitsubishi Colt 2008 vs Ford Focus 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.5 (petrol) | 1.4 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 109 HP | 80 - 225 HP | |
| Torque: | 100 - 145 NM | 124 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 13.2 seconds | 6.8 - 14.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 6.2 | 4.7 - 9.3 | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Focus. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.94 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is smaller, but higher. Mitsubishi Colt is 40 cm shorter than the Ford Focus, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 385 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1032 litres | 1247 litres | |
|
Ford Focus has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Colt has 165 litres less trunk space than the Ford Focus. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Focus (by 215 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.4 metres more than that of the Ford Focus, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`457 | ~ 1`775 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Ford Focus has
| |