Mitsubishi ASX 2025 vs Dacia Sandero 2026
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Hybrid | |
| Petrol engines (Mitsubishi ASX) are generally cheaper to purchase and maintain, with simpler mechanics and consistent highway performance. Hybrid (Dacia Sandero) engines, on the other hand, provide significantly better fuel efficiency and lower emissions, especially in urban and stop-and-go traffic conditions. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 158 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 NM | 172 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Dacia Sandero is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 49 HP less power than Dacia Sandero, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 4.4 l/100km | 4.4 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 8.80 € | no data | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 48 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 169 mm (6.7 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Dacia Sandero can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Dacia Sandero version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.59 m | |
| Mitsubishi ASX is 14 cm longer than the Dacia Sandero, 6 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 348 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1458 litres | 1455 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mitsubishi ASX uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi ASX (by 3 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.5 metres more than that of the Dacia Sandero, which means Mitsubishi ASX can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`890 kg | 1`745 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`374 kg | 1`307 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 516 kg | 438 kg | |
| Mitsubishi ASX load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 15 procentiem more than Dacia Sandero. Therefore, Mitsubishi ASX is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Dacia Sandero has
| |