Mitsubishi ASX 2023 vs Nissan Juke 2024
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Hybrid | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Hybrid engines (Mitsubishi ASX) offer better fuel economy and lower emissions than petrol engines, especially in city driving with frequent stops. Petrol (Nissan Juke) engines, however, are typically less expensive to buy and maintain, and offer more consistent performance on highways. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 92 HP | 94 HP | |
| Torque: | 144 NM | 148 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 2 HP less power than Nissan Juke, whereas torque is 4 NM less than Nissan Juke. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 1.4 l/100km + 13.4 kWh/100km | 4.9 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 6.70 € | 9.20 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/lElectricity€/kWh | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 39 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | no data | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Nissan Juke 2024 1.6 engine: A simple and reliable engine, not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Tends to consume more oil, may have problems starting in cold weather. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.59 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi ASX is 2 cm longer than the Nissan Juke, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 265 litres | 354 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1118 litres | 1237 litres | |
|
Nissan Juke has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mitsubishi ASX uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Juke (by 119 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.5 metres more than that of the Nissan Juke, which means Mitsubishi ASX can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`060 kg | 1`810 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`596 kg | 1`330 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 464 kg | 480 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan Juke has
| |