Mitsubishi ASX 2019 vs Kia Sportage 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 167 HP | 176 HP | |
| Torque: | 222 NM | 227 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 9 HP less power than Kia Sportage, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Kia Sportage. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 9.2 | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi ASX consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sportage, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi ASX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | 172 mm (6.8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi ASX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mitsubishi ASX version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
| Kia Sportage 2010 2.4 engine: Generally reliable and easy to maintain engine, with spare parts available. The engine is not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Although the manufacturer does not specify a chain change interval, it ... More about Kia Sportage 2010 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is smaller, but slightly higher. Mitsubishi ASX is 8 cm shorter than the Kia Sportage, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 740 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1193 litres | 1547 litres | |
|
Kia Sportage has more luggage space. Mitsubishi ASX has 340 litres less trunk space than the Kia Sportage. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Sportage (by 354 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 1`970 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Sportage has serious deffects in 480 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 600 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Kia Sportage has
| |