Mitsubishi ASX 2019 vs Skoda Karoq 2017
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 195 NM | 250 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
Skoda Karoq is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi ASX and Skoda Karoq have the same engine power, but Mitsubishi ASX torque is 55 NM less than Skoda Karoq. Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 5.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
The Skoda Karoq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi ASX could require 240 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 18 years | 7 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Peugeot 4008 | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Skoda Superb, Audi Q3, Audi A1, Skoda Scala | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Skoda Karoq engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.37 m | 4.38 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.64 m | 1.61 m | |
Mitsubishi ASX is smaller, but slightly higher. Mitsubishi ASX is 2 cm shorter than the Skoda Karoq, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 406 litres | 521 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1206 litres | no data | |
Skoda Karoq has more luggage space. Mitsubishi ASX has 115 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`970 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 18 200 | 24 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |