Mitsubishi ASX 2019 vs Skoda Karoq 2017

 
Mitsubishi ASX
2019 -
Skoda Karoq
2017 -
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.5 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 150 HP150 HP
Torque: 195 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.2 seconds8.4 seconds
Skoda Karoq is a more dynamic driving.
Mitsubishi ASX and Skoda Karoq have the same engine power, but Mitsubishi ASX torque is 55 NM less than Skoda Karoq. Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.75.1
Real fuel consumption: 7.7 l/100km6.9 l/100km
The Skoda Karoq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi ASX could require 240 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq.

Engines

Engine production duration: 18 years7 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Peugeot 4008Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Skoda Superb, Audi Q3, Audi A1, Skoda Scala
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Skoda Karoq engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.37 m4.38 m
Width: 1.77 m1.84 m
Height: 1.64 m1.61 m
Mitsubishi ASX is smaller, but slightly higher.
Mitsubishi ASX is 2 cm shorter than the Skoda Karoq, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 406 litres521 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1206 litresno data
Skoda Karoq has more luggage space.
Mitsubishi ASX has 115 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Karoq.
Turning diameter: 10.6 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 1`970no data
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 18 20024 000
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi ASX has
  • timing chain engine
  • lower price
Skoda Karoq has
  • timing belt engine
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv