Mitsubishi ASX 2019 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.2 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Mitsubishi ASX) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Mitsubishi Pajero) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 20 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 178 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Despite less power, Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi ASX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 600 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 4.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 88 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 820 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is smaller. Mitsubishi ASX is 2 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 21 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 406 litres | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1206 litres | 1790 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Mitsubishi ASX has 191 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Pajero. The Mitsubishi Pajero may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Pajero (by 584 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`970 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 14 600 | 12 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |