Mitsubishi ASX 2019 vs Nissan Qashqai 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 35 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi ASX could require 135 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi ASX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mitsubishi ASX version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Peugeot 4008 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Juke, Nissan Pulsar | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi ASX might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is smaller, but higher. Mitsubishi ASX is 3 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 406 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1206 litres | 1585 litres | |
|
Nissan Qashqai has more luggage space. Mitsubishi ASX has 24 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 379 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.1 metres less than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`970 | 1`880 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 800 | 14 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |