Mitsubishi ASX 2019 vs Jeep Compass 2017
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 170 HP | |
Torque: | 195 NM | 250 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
Jeep Compass is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 20 HP less power than Jeep Compass, whereas torque is 55 NM less than Jeep Compass. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi ASX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
1080 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
810 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Jeep Compass 2017: It can have Freedom Drive I or II - an electronically controlled four-wheel drive system. Normally, the car has front-wheel drive, but if wheel slip is detected, it can automatically send up to 50% power to the rear wheels. The Freedom Drive I system is designed primarily for snow and similar conditions with limited traction. The Freedom Drive II version adds an off-road four-wheel drive mode, traction control, optimized engine and transmission performance for rock crawling, and hill descent control (not in EU editions). | |||
Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Compass can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.37 m | 4.39 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
Mitsubishi ASX is smaller. Mitsubishi ASX is 3 cm shorter than the Jeep Compass, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 406 litres | 458 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1206 litres | no data | |
Jeep Compass has more luggage space. Mitsubishi ASX has 52 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Compass. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.5 metres less than that of the Jeep Compass, which means Mitsubishi ASX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`970 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 13 600 | 23 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Jeep Compass has
| |