Mitsubishi ASX 2019 vs Cupra Ateca 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 5.2 seconds | |
|
Cupra Ateca is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 150 HP less power than Cupra Ateca, whereas torque is 205 NM less than Cupra Ateca. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 6.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 9.7 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Cupra Ateca, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi ASX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Cupra Ateca. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is smaller, but slightly higher. Mitsubishi ASX is 1 cm shorter than the Cupra Ateca, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 406 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1206 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.2 metres less than that of the Cupra Ateca. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`970 | 2`150 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 600 | 22 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Cupra Ateca has
| |