Mitsubishi ASX 2019 vs BMW X2 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Mitsubishi ASX) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (BMW X2) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
|
BMW X2 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 40 HP less power than BMW X2, whereas torque is 205 NM less than BMW X2. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi ASX could require 255 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 1060 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 182 mm (7.2 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Peugeot 4008 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including BMW 1 sērija, BMW 2 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi ASX might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The BMW X2 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ... More about BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.53 m | |
| Mitsubishi ASX and BMW X2 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 406 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1206 litres | 1355 litres | |
|
BMW X2 has more luggage space. Mitsubishi ASX has 64 litres less trunk space than the BMW X2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X2 (by 149 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.7 metres less than that of the BMW X2, which means Mitsubishi ASX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`970 | 2`190 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 800 | 21 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
BMW X2 has
| |