Mitsubishi ASX 2016 vs Honda CR-V 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 46 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi ASX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1300 km in combined cycle | 1230 km in combined cycle | |
| 1420 km on highway | 1230 km on highway | ||
| 980 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2015: Vehicle features automatic four-wheel drive system that sends torque to front wheels under typical conditions. Electronically controlled multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear wheels when slipping is detected. The all-wheel drive system constantly communicates with the VSA dynamic stabilization system and the electric power steering to maintain full control of the vehicle, good traction and maneuverability in any road conditions. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi ASX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mitsubishi ASX version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from three 4x4 versions of Mitsubishi ASX 2016 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 2.10 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is smaller. Mitsubishi ASX is 25 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 29 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | 1669 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Mitsubishi ASX has 170 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 450 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 1.1 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Mitsubishi ASX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`980 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda CR-V has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |