Mitsubishi ASX 2016 vs Nissan X-Trail 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 16 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi ASX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1300 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 1420 km on highway | 1330 km on highway | ||
| 980 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan X-Trail version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Nissan X-Trail 2014 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2014 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Nissan X-Trail 2014 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is smaller. Mitsubishi ASX is 29 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | 1877 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Mitsubishi ASX has 131 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 658 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.6 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Mitsubishi ASX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`980 | 2`310 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 400 | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |