Mitsubishi ASX 2016 vs Dacia Duster 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 4 HP more power than Dacia Duster, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Dacia Duster. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Duster, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi ASX could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Duster. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1300 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1420 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| 980 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Dacia Duster can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Dacia Duster version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from four 4x4 versions of Dacia Duster 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is larger, but lower. Mitsubishi ASX is 1 cm longer than the Dacia Duster, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | 445 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | 1478 litres | |
|
Dacia Duster has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi ASX has 26 litres less trunk space than the Dacia Duster. This could mean that the Mitsubishi ASX uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dacia Duster (by 259 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.5 metres more than that of the Dacia Duster, which means Mitsubishi ASX can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`980 | 1`819 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Duster has serious deffects in 210 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Dacia Duster has
| |