Mitsubishi ASX 2016 vs Seat Ateca 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Seat Ateca is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 1 HP less power than Seat Ateca, but torque is 20 NM more than Seat Ateca. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Ateca is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ateca, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi ASX could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ateca. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1200 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| 980 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.60 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi ASX is 2 cm longer than the Seat Ateca, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | no data | |
|
Seat Ateca has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi ASX has 91 litres less trunk space than the Seat Ateca. This could mean that the Mitsubishi ASX uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.2 metres less than that of the Seat Ateca. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`980 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Seat Ateca has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi ASX has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Seat Ateca, so Seat Ateca quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 000 | 19 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Seat Ateca has
| |