Mitsubishi ASX 2016 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 36 HP less power than Mitsubishi Outlander, but torque is 75 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi ASX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1200 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 980 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi Outlander can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mitsubishi Outlander version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from eight 4x4 versions of Mitsubishi Outlander 2015 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.68 m | |
| Mitsubishi ASX is 34 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | 1754 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage space. Mitsubishi ASX has 131 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 535 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`980 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Outlander has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 400 | 16 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |