Mitsubishi ASX 2016 vs Seat Ateca 2016

 
Mitsubishi ASX
2016 - 2017
Seat Ateca
2016 -
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.3 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 150 HP150 HP
Torque: 360 NM340 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.8 seconds8.5 seconds
Mitsubishi ASX and Seat Ateca have the same engine power, but Mitsubishi ASX torque is 20 NM more than Seat Ateca. Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.84.4
Real fuel consumption: 7.7 l/100km6.5 l/100km
The Seat Ateca is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ateca, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi ASX could require 210 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ateca.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1030 km in combined cycle1130 km in combined cycle
770 km with real consumption760 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.36 m4.34 m
Width: 1.81 m1.81 m
Height: 1.63 m1.60 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi ASX is 2 cm longer than the Seat Ateca, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 419 litres510 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1219 litresno data
Seat Ateca has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi ASX has 91 litres less trunk space than the Seat Ateca. This could mean that the Mitsubishi ASX uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.2 metres less than that of the Seat Ateca.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0601`970
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

high
Seat Ateca has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi ASX has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Seat Ateca, so Seat Ateca quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 11 20018 600
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi ASX has
  • has 4x4 drive
  • lower price
Seat Ateca has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv