Mitsubishi ASX 2016 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi ASX and Mitsubishi Outlander have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.8 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi Outlander can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 14 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.68 m | |
| Mitsubishi ASX is 34 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | 128 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | 1608 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Mitsubishi ASX has 291 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The Mitsubishi Outlander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 389 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`060 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Outlander has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 18 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |