Mitsubishi ASX 2016 vs Honda HR-V 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Mitsubishi ASX) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Honda HR-V) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 172 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 10 HP more power than Honda HR-V, whereas torque is 188 NM more than Honda HR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda HR-V, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi ASX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda HR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 660 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi ASX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.61 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi ASX is 6 cm longer than the Honda HR-V, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | 431 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | 1456 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi ASX has 12 litres less trunk space than the Honda HR-V. This could mean that the Mitsubishi ASX uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda HR-V (by 237 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.8 metres less than that of the Honda HR-V, which means Mitsubishi ASX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`060 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 000 | 17 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
| |