Mitsubishi ASX 2015 vs Toyota RAV4 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 158 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 198 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 44 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, but torque is 72 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi ASX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 420 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1360 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1500 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 1100 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 191 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota RAV4 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Toyota RAV4 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from six 4x4 versions of Toyota RAV4 2010 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is smaller. Mitsubishi ASX is 7 cm shorter than the Toyota RAV4, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | 1752 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Mitsubishi ASX has 167 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 533 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Mitsubishi ASX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`070 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota RAV4 has serious deffects in 135 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 000 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |