Mitsubishi ASX 2012 vs Honda CR-V 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 6 HP less power than Honda CR-V, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite less power, Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi ASX could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1230 km in combined cycle | 1280 km in combined cycle | |
| 1400 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 1050 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is smaller. Mitsubishi ASX is 28 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 416 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1193 litres | 1669 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Mitsubishi ASX has 173 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 476 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 1.2 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Mitsubishi ASX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`060 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda CR-V has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 000 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |