Mitsubishi ASX 2012 vs Hyundai ix35 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 1 HP less power than Hyundai ix35, but torque is 40 NM more than Hyundai ix35. Despite less power, Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 5.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1210 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1400 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 1030 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is smaller. Mitsubishi ASX is 12 cm shorter than the Hyundai ix35, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 416 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1193 litres | 1436 litres | |
|
Hyundai ix35 has more luggage space. Mitsubishi ASX has 175 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai ix35. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai ix35 (by 243 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`060 kg | 2`140 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`505 kg | 1`525 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 555 kg | 615 kg | |
| Mitsubishi ASX load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem less than Hyundai ix35. Therefore, Hyundai ix35 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai ix35 has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 600 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Hyundai ix35 has
| |