Mitsubishi ASX 2012 vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 40 HP more power than Volkswagen Tiguan, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Volkswagen Tiguan. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Tiguan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi ASX could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 1330 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Tiguan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volkswagen Tiguan can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volkswagen Tiguan version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from thirteen 4x4 versions of Volkswagen Tiguan 2011 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is smaller. Mitsubishi ASX is 13 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Tiguan, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 384 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1219 litres | 1510 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has more luggage space. Mitsubishi ASX has 86 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Tiguan. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Tiguan (by 291 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 1.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means Mitsubishi ASX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`060 kg | 2`080 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`460 kg | 1`468 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 600 kg | 612 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Tiguan has serious deffects in 100 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has
| |