Mitsubishi ASX 2012 vs Seat Ateca 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi ASX and Seat Ateca have the same engine power, but Mitsubishi ASX torque is 40 NM less than Seat Ateca. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Ateca is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ateca, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi ASX could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ateca. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.60 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi ASX is 4 cm shorter than the Seat Ateca, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 384 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | no data | |
|
Seat Ateca has more luggage space. Mitsubishi ASX has 126 litres less trunk space than the Seat Ateca. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.2 metres less than that of the Seat Ateca. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`060 | 1`970 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Seat Ateca has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi ASX has serious deffects in 115 percent more cases than Seat Ateca, so Seat Ateca quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 11 000 | 19 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Seat Ateca has
| |