Mitsubishi ASX 2012 vs Peugeot 3008 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 40 HP more power than Peugeot 3008, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Peugeot 3008. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 3008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 3008, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi ASX could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 3008. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 3008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C5, Peugeot 207, Citroen C4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 3008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Peugeot 3008 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Peugeot 3008 2009 1.6 engine: This diesel engine is known for its high reliability and impressive lifespan, combined with excellent fuel efficiency for its power output. It features hydraulic lifters in the cylinder head and uses a Common ... More about Peugeot 3008 2009 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.64 m | |
| Mitsubishi ASX is 3 cm longer than the Peugeot 3008, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 384 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | 1604 litres | |
|
Peugeot 3008 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi ASX has 48 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 3008. This could mean that the Mitsubishi ASX uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 3008 (by 385 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.4 metres less than that of the Peugeot 3008, which means Mitsubishi ASX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`060 | 2`030 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 000 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Peugeot 3008 has
| |