Mitsubishi ASX 2012 vs Nissan Qashqai 2010

 
Mitsubishi ASX
2012 - 2015
Nissan Qashqai
2010 - 2013
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Diesel1.5 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 150 HP103 HP
Torque: 300 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds12.5 seconds
Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 47 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Nissan Qashqai.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.75.3
Real fuel consumption: 6.6 l/100km5.9 l/100km
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi ASX could require 60 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1050 km in combined cycle1220 km in combined cycle
1200 km on highway1380 km on highway
900 km with real consumption1100 km with real consumption
Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Ground clearance: 170 mm (6.7 inches)201 mm (7.9 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Qashqai can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan Qashqai version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from five 4x4 versions of Nissan Qashqai 2010 if off-road driveability is important to you.

Engines

Engine production duration: 5 years8 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carInstalled on at least 22 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Qashqai might be a better choice in this respect.
Nissan Qashqai 2010 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ...  More about Nissan Qashqai 2010 1.5 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.30 m4.33 m
Width: 1.77 m1.78 m
Height: 1.63 m1.61 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi ASX is 4 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 384 litres410 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1219 litres1513 litres
Nissan Qashqai has more luggage space.
Mitsubishi ASX has 26 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 294 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`0601`930
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high

low
Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 11 0006200
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi ASX has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • has 4x4 drive
  • fewer faults
Nissan Qashqai has
  • timing belt engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ground clearance
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv