Mitsubishi ASX 2012 vs Ford EcoSport 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 14 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 55 HP more power than Ford EcoSport, whereas torque is 85 NM more than Ford EcoSport. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Ford EcoSport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford EcoSport, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi ASX could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford EcoSport. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford EcoSport can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Ford EcoSport version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.65 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi ASX is 2 cm longer than the Ford EcoSport, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 384 litres | 333 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | 1238 litres | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has 51 litres more trunk space than the Ford EcoSport. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford EcoSport (by 19 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`060 | 1`760 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Ford EcoSport has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi ASX has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Ford EcoSport, so Ford EcoSport quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Ford EcoSport has
| |