Mitsubishi ASX 2012 vs Dacia Duster 2013

 
Mitsubishi ASX
2012 - 2015
Dacia Duster
2013 - 2017
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Diesel1.5 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 150 HP90 HP
Torque: 300 NM201 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds13.8 seconds
Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 60 HP more power than Dacia Duster, whereas torque is 99 NM more than Dacia Duster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.74.7
Real fuel consumption: 6.6 l/100km6.0 l/100km
The Dacia Duster is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Duster, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi ASX could require 150 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Duster.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1050 km in combined cycle1060 km in combined cycle
1200 km on highway1110 km on highway
900 km with real consumption830 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Ground clearance: 170 mm (6.7 inches)205 mm (8.1 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Dacia Duster can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Dacia Duster version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from two 4x4 versions of Dacia Duster 2013 if off-road driveability is important to you.

Engines

Engine production duration: 5 years8 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carInstalled on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Nissan Juke
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Duster might be a better choice in this respect.
Dacia Duster 2013 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ...  More about Dacia Duster 2013 1.5 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.30 m4.32 m
Width: 1.77 m1.82 m
Height: 1.63 m1.63 m
Mitsubishi ASX is smaller.
Mitsubishi ASX is 2 cm shorter than the Dacia Duster, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 384 litres473 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1219 litres1636 litres
Dacia Duster has more luggage space.
Mitsubishi ASX has 89 litres less trunk space than the Dacia Duster. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dacia Duster (by 417 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.2 metres more than that of the Dacia Duster.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0601`775
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high

low
Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Duster has serious deffects in 135 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 11 0006000
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi ASX has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • has 4x4 drive
  • fewer faults
Dacia Duster has
  • timing belt engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher ground clearance
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv