Mitsubishi ASX 2013 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2010
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 1.8 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 360 NM | 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 10 seconds | |
Mitsubishi ASX 2013 and Mitsubishi ASX 2010 have the same engine power, but Mitsubishi ASX 2013 torque is 60 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX 2010. Mitsubishi ASX 2013 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
The Mitsubishi ASX 2010 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi ASX 2013 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX 2010, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi ASX 2013 could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi ASX 2013 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX 2010. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 63 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
1200 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
800 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
Mitsubishi ASX 2010 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 330'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi ASX 2013 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 15 years | 5 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi L 200 | Used only for this car | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi ASX 2013 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.30 m | 4.30 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.63 m | 1.62 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi ASX 2013 and Mitsubishi ASX 2010 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | 419 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | 1219 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | high | |
Average price (€): | 11 000 | 6000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |