Mitsubishi ASX 2010 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 3.8 Petrol | |
Diesel (Mitsubishi ASX) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Mitsubishi Pajero) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 247 HP | |
Torque: | 300 NM | 329 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 10 seconds | |
Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 97 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 29 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 13.4 | |
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi ASX consumes 7.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi ASX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 1155 litres of fuel. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.30 m | 4.39 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.88 m | |
Height: | 1.62 m | 1.85 m | |
Mitsubishi ASX is smaller. Mitsubishi ASX is 9 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 24 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`665 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | below average | |
Average price (€): | 6000 | 14 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |