Mitsubishi ASX 2010 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 20 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 73 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Despite less power, Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 4.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi ASX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 720 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 5.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is smaller. Mitsubishi ASX is 9 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 24 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 14 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |