Mitsubishi ASX 2010 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | n/a NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 40 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi ASX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1100 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.97 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is smaller. Mitsubishi ASX is 7 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 20 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | 575 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Mitsubishi ASX has 156 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.7 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means Mitsubishi ASX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 14 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |