Mitsubishi ASX 2019 vs Toyota RAV4 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 146 HP | |
| Torque: | 197 NM | 187 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 4 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.3 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi ASX could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Peugeot 4008 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Camry | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi ASX might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota RAV4 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is smaller. Mitsubishi ASX is 24 cm shorter than the Toyota RAV4, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 384 litres | 577 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1206 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Mitsubishi ASX has 193 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`970 | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi ASX has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 18 200 | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |