Mitsubishi ASX 2019 vs Toyota C-HR 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 197 NM | 142 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 28 HP more power than Toyota C-HR, whereas torque is 55 NM more than Toyota C-HR. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 3.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.2 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota C-HR is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 3.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota C-HR, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi ASX could require 570 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 3.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota C-HR. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota C-HR gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Peugeot 4008 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi ASX might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota C-HR engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is larger. Mitsubishi ASX and Toyota C-HR are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 384 litres | 377 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1206 litres | no data | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has 7 litres more trunk space than the Toyota C-HR. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota C-HR, which means Mitsubishi ASX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`970 | 1`860 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 600 | 21 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Toyota C-HR has
| |