Mitsubishi ASX 2019 vs BMW X2 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 306 HP | |
| Torque: | 197 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 5 seconds | |
|
BMW X2 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 156 HP less power than BMW X2, whereas torque is 253 NM less than BMW X2. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 6.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.2 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi ASX could require 240 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 182 mm (7.2 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Peugeot 4008 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including BMW 1 sērija, BMW 2 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi ASX might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The BMW X2 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine: Compared to their predecessors, B48 engines are more robust and less prone to major failures. They are well-suited for chip tuning, which can noticeably enhance performance and responsiveness without ... More about BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.53 m | |
| Mitsubishi ASX and BMW X2 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 384 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1206 litres | 1355 litres | |
|
BMW X2 has more luggage space. Mitsubishi ASX has 86 litres less trunk space than the BMW X2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X2 (by 149 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.7 metres less than that of the BMW X2, which means Mitsubishi ASX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`970 | 2`190 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 600 | 27 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
BMW X2 has
| |