Mitsubishi ASX 2019 vs Toyota C-HR 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Toyota C-HR is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 1 HP more power than Toyota C-HR, but torque is 31 NM less than Toyota C-HR. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota C-HR, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi ASX could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota C-HR. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi ASX engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 10 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi ASX might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota C-HR engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is larger. Mitsubishi ASX and Toyota C-HR are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 384 litres | 377 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1206 litres | no data | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has 7 litres more trunk space than the Toyota C-HR. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota C-HR, which means Mitsubishi ASX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 1`865 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 800 | 17 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
| |