Mitsubishi ASX 2019 vs Skoda Karoq 2021
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Skoda Karoq is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 33 HP less power than Skoda Karoq, whereas torque is 96 NM less than Skoda Karoq. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Karoq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi ASX could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 1110 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Mitsubishi ASX 2019 1.6 engine: The Mitsubishi 4A92 is a 1.6-liter inline four-cylinder engine with a timing chain, known primarily for its low fuel consumption and relatively simple construction. It is widely used in models such as the Lancer and ASX. While the engine is fairly economical and inexpensive to maintain, it also has ... More about Mitsubishi ASX 2019 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.63 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi ASX is 2 cm shorter than the Skoda Karoq, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 384 litres | 521 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1206 litres | 1630 litres | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage space. Mitsubishi ASX has 137 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Karoq (by 424 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.3 metres less than that of the Skoda Karoq. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`870 kg | 1`920 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 600 | 25 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |