Mitsubishi ASX 2019 vs Skoda Karoq 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Skoda Karoq is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 33 HP less power than Skoda Karoq, whereas torque is 96 NM less than Skoda Karoq. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi ASX could require 90 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 176 mm (6.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi ASX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mitsubishi ASX version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Skoda Karoq engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Skoda Superb, Skoda Scala, Audi A1, Audi Q3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Skoda Karoq engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Mitsubishi ASX 2019 1.6 engine: The Mitsubishi 4A92 is a 1.6-liter inline four-cylinder engine with a timing chain, known primarily for its low fuel consumption and relatively simple construction. It is widely used in models such as the Lancer and ASX. While the engine is fairly economical and inexpensive to maintain, it also has ... More about Mitsubishi ASX 2019 1.6 engine Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine: The engine is praised for being both flexible and torquey, delivering impressive performance for its horsepower rating. It is also remarkably fuel-efficient. However, the engine is very demanding when it comes ... More about Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.61 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi ASX is 2 cm shorter than the Skoda Karoq, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 384 litres | 521 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1206 litres | 1630 litres | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage space. Mitsubishi ASX has 137 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Karoq (by 424 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.3 metres less than that of the Skoda Karoq. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`870 kg | 1`929 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 600 | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |