Mitsubishi ASX 2019 vs Skoda Karoq 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Skoda Karoq is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 33 HP less power than Skoda Karoq, whereas torque is 96 NM less than Skoda Karoq. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Karoq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi ASX could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Skoda Superb, Audi Q3, Audi A1, Skoda Scala | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Skoda Karoq engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.61 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi ASX is 2 cm shorter than the Skoda Karoq, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 384 litres | 521 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1206 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage space. Mitsubishi ASX has 137 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 800 | 23 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |