Mitsubishi ASX 2019 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Hybrid | |
| Petrol engines (Mitsubishi ASX) are generally cheaper to purchase and maintain, with simpler mechanics and consistent highway performance. Hybrid (Land Rover Range Rover Evoque) engines, on the other hand, provide significantly better fuel efficiency and lower emissions, especially in urban and stop-and-go traffic conditions. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 NM | 365 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 132 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 211 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 11.40 € | no data | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 212 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Land Rover Defender, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Mitsubishi ASX 2019 1.6 engine: The Mitsubishi 4A92 is a 1.6-liter inline four-cylinder engine with a timing chain, known primarily for its low fuel consumption and relatively simple construction. It is widely used in models such as the Lancer and ASX. While the engine is fairly economical and inexpensive to maintain, it also has ... More about Mitsubishi ASX 2019 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is smaller. Mitsubishi ASX and Land Rover Range Rover Evoque are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 384 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1206 litres | 1383 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Mitsubishi ASX has 207 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover Evoque (by 177 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 1 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means Mitsubishi ASX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`870 kg | 2`430 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 600 | 26 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |