Mitsubishi ASX 2019 vs Kia Sportage 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 135 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Kia Sportage is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 18 HP less power than Kia Sportage, whereas torque is 11 NM less than Kia Sportage. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 6.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sportage, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi ASX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sportage. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Kia Sportage engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai i30 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Sportage might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Kia Sportage 2010 1.6 engine: The engine is generally a reliable design and not particularly sensitive to fuel quality. However, it is prone to several common issues. One of the most widespread problems is the rapid buildup of carbon ... More about Kia Sportage 2010 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is smaller. Mitsubishi ASX is 8 cm shorter than the Kia Sportage, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 384 litres | 564 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1206 litres | 1353 litres | |
|
Kia Sportage has more luggage space. Mitsubishi ASX has 180 litres less trunk space than the Kia Sportage. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Sportage (by 147 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 1`830 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Sportage has serious deffects in 365 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 15 600 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Kia Sportage has
| |