Mitsubishi ASX 2017 vs Opel Mokka 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 197 NM | 155 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 35 HP more power than Opel Mokka, whereas torque is 42 NM more than Opel Mokka. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 6.5 | |
|
The Opel Mokka is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi ASX consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi ASX could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| Opel Mokka gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 158 mm (6.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi ASX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Peugeot 4008 | Used also on Opel Astra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi ASX might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.66 m | |
| Mitsubishi ASX is 2 cm longer than the Opel Mokka, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 384 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | 1372 litres | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has 28 litres more trunk space than the Opel Mokka. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Mokka (by 153 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.9 metres less than that of the Opel Mokka, which means Mitsubishi ASX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`970 | 1`764 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Opel Mokka has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi ASX has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Opel Mokka, so Opel Mokka quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Opel Mokka has
| |