Mitsubishi ASX 2017 vs Suzuki SX4 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 197 NM | 156 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 33 HP more power than Suzuki SX4, whereas torque is 41 NM more than Suzuki SX4. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 47 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi ASX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 24 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Peugeot 4008 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Vitara | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki SX4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Suzuki SX4 2016 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.59 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi ASX and Suzuki SX4 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 384 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | 1269 litres | |
|
Suzuki SX4 has more luggage space. Mitsubishi ASX has 46 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki SX4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki SX4 (by 50 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.2 metres more than that of the Suzuki SX4. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`970 | 1`720 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Suzuki SX4, so Mitsubishi ASX quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 15 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Suzuki SX4 has
| |